home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: thelma.ing.umu.se!fr94tmg
- From: fr94tmg@ing.umu.se (Tomas Moberg)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.cbm
- Subject: Re: GEOS 2.0 Vs. GEOS 1.3
- Date: 16 Jan 1996 21:46:32 GMT
- Organization: UmeĎ Universitet
- Message-ID: <4dh6bo$eo8@studium.student.umu.se>
- References: <4cs633$roe@news.cc.ucf.edu> <doug.cotton-1501962359510001@s108.the-spa.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: thelma.ing.umu.se
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
-
- Doug Cotton (doug.cotton@the-spa.com) wrote:
-
- : I think most people with 128's prefer the 128 version. The screen display
- : in 80-column mode is a lot crisper, and the 128-specific applications let
- : you see the full width of your document on the screen without any
- : scrolling. Practically all of the applications written for GEOS 64 work
- : with the 128 version (though some may require switching to 40-column mode)
- : as well. The only two I can think of offhand that won't work are geoBASIC
- : and geoProgrammer.
-
- I use geoBasic on my Geos128 ! The only occasion i had problem was when I used
- Blackout at the same time.
-
-
- --
-
- *** COMMODORE 64 BASIC V2 ***
-
- 64K RAM SYSTEM 38911 BASIC BYTES FREE
-
- 10 Tomas Moberg : Tel:+046(0)90-129927
- 20 Hemvagen 20 : fr94tmg@ing.umu.se
- 30 S-90336 Umea : Commodore64/128,HP48
- 40 Sweden : Pinball & DOOM 8-)
-
- READY.
-